• Home
  • Contact Me
  • Sermons and Talks
Subscribe: Posts | Comments | E-mail
  • Africa
  • Cape Town
  • Church Planting
  • Community
  • Culture
  • Missional
  • South Africa

stephenmurray.co.za

Posted on August 19, 2011 - by Stephen Murray

The Main Thing is the Only Thing

Featured Gospel
The Main Thing is the Only Thing

Joe Thorn has written an interesting blog post lending his voice to the current discussion about the “gospel-centered movement”. There’s been a lot of talk on this issue, and issues related to it in the last month or so. If you’re curious in following the whole discussion see Justin Taylor’s summary blog. I think I understand something of the tension that has given rise to this discussion in the first place. People like Sean Lucas have pointed out that this issue has a long history and so I don’t expect that tension to be resolved overnight. Essentially there seems to be this feeling that we can overemphasize the indicatives of the gospel to the detriment of the imperatives and as a result we need to be careful not to smother the imperatives in our quest to make the main thing the main thing.

Joe Thorn is a very thoughtful and pastoral blogger and so at one level I’m loathe to (ever so slightly) disagree with him, but here goes. His main contention is that in our quest to make the main thing the main thing we pretend as if it’s the only thing. So here’s a quote at the heart of the post:

There is more in God’s word than the gospel. God has given us his law to show us the way, uncover our corruption and condemnation, and point us to our need of redemption. There are commands to be obeyed, there is wisdom to learn and practice, and affections to feel and be moved by. But, the law itself is unable to create within us new hearts, or empower us to obey its demands. So let me say it this way: The gospel is the main thing, it is not the only thing. However, it is the only thing that brings life, power, and transformation. The gospel isn’t everything, but it does connect to everything, and preachers and teachers in the church must be able to show that connection lest we allow the church to drift (or even be lead) into various kinds of hopeless, powerless legalism.

He goes on to apply this to the issue of prayer. Now I would pastorally tackle the issue of prayer in exactly the same way that he does. My slight difference comes in the way he’s nuanced his thesis in the whole post – i.e. questioning whether the main thing is the only thing. I wonder, just wonder, if that’s the most helpful way to think about it: As if the Bible contains the main thing (the gospel) at it’s center and then it’s surrounded by a whole bunch of other stuff (law, wisdom, etc). Whilst we’d all, no doubt, confirm that all those things are connected (so law leads us to our need for redemption for example – Thorn affirms the connection), I wonder if it might not be the intimacy and inter-connectedness of all the different elements, that make up the Bible’s content, where the tension is coming in. I think we might still be systematizing the content too much which allows us to talk about “the main thing” as not the “only thing”, presuming the existence of “other things”. My contention is that the main thing is so tightly tied to the other things that in a cohesive whole sense it is the only thing. Does that make sense?

Is it not possible that lingering modernist epistemology forces us to diminish that intimate connection and relationship somewhat as we try to put categories to the content of the Bible. I’m not for one second saying that we can’t systematize or categorize the content of the Bible, but I am saying that the relationship is so intimate and integrative between the gospel and the categories that for me it’s hard to speak about other things that are in some way separate from the main thing and therefore need to be emphasized in their own right (as DeYoung seems to suggest). Maybe I’m sprouting nonsense.

My concern is simply the centrality and supremacy of the gospel of Jesus Christ as our hope, guide, wisdom, life, everything pertaining to our relationship with God and this world. If we don’t have that (and I think we are prone to move off of it daily in our sinfulness) then we ave no power (Rom 1:16) and we are trusting in ourselves and law to bring about transformation, renewal, life and relationship.

Share
This entry was posted on Friday, August 19th, 2011 at 10:59 am and is filed under Featured, Gospel. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Comments

We'd love to hear yours!



  1. Visit My Website

    August 19, 2011

    Permalink

    Leslie said:


    Great Post. I haven’t been following this issue that closely but you make me want to check it out. At first glance, I probably totally agree with you (surprise!) and I don’t think you’re spouting nonsense at all.



  2. Visit My Website

    August 19, 2011

    Permalink

    John Scheepers said:


    At the risk of taking this off on another debatable issue… Is it perhaps our choice of language/terminology that frames some of the debate? So if for instance we used Kingdom language a bit more – some of that tension between indicative and imperative may be lessened?

    In other words the gospel (declaration) is a word about the in-breaking rule and reign of King Jesus. This word is a declaration that it is good to live under the reign of King Jesus and that Jesus has made it possible for us to do that. The gospel word then invites us to live under the reign of King Jesus.

    I realise that the tension still remains but it (certainly to me) feels less of a tension than when we frame the issue in “personal salvation” language. Rather than personal salvation as a “subset” of the bigger Kingdom declaration/invitation?

    Now, as I know you will, show me fault/lack in that line of thinking?



  3. Visit My Website

    August 19, 2011

    Permalink

    Stephen Murray said:


    @John – I’m not sure I completely understand what you’re proposing. Maybe that would help. Here’s my thing: When Jesus says in Luke 24 that the Bible is about him I just don’t think that in his head he’s going, “Well it’s mostly about me – there is some other stuff in there: law, wisdom – but it’s mostly about me.” Now to be fair to Joe Thorn he probably wouldn’t put it that way either. But I really feel like Jesus, and the examples of the pastoral approach that the apostles use in their letters, is pushing us to see that it’s all about Jesus, it’s all about the gospel. I know that’s nuanced and I know it needs explanation but I really think the main thing is the only thing as far as the content of the Christian faith is concerned. I also have a sneaking suspicion that if we get this right we’ll get the tension right too. But then what do I know.



  4. Visit My Website

    August 19, 2011

    Permalink

    Thomas Scarborough said:


    The issue is perhaps that the Word is to be interpreted either in terms of the gospel, or on its own terms — a major contemporary debate. That is, it is either to be relativised by the gospel, or all of it is to be in an important sense absolute.




Leave a Reply


Here's your chance to speak.

Click here to cancel reply.

  1. Name (required)

    Mail (required)

    Website

    Message

  • Stephen Murray

    A church planter based in Cape Town. Husband to Robin and father of Genevieve. I am captivated by the hope of the gospel and I constantly dream about seeing it at work in my city. Dream with me.

  • Twitter

  • Links

    • Creation Project
    • GCM Collective
    • Redeemer City to City
    • The Gospel Coalition
    • The Porterbrook Network
  • Categories

  • Archives

© 2008 stephenmurray.co.za - light conversations of a church planter…
The Papercut theme by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes